Here are two excerpts the editor from BBJ provided detailing
Pinterest’s terms of service:
"By making available any Member Content through the
Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide,
irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with
the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license,
sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream,
broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on,
through or by means of the Site, Application or Services."
"... you represent and warrant that: (i) you either
are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content that you make available
through the Site, Application and Services or you have all rights, licenses,
consents and releases that are necessary to grant to Cold Brew Labs the rights
in such Member Content, as contemplated under these Terms."
(Source: bizjournals.com)
There is no doubt Pinterest has made its mark as one of the top
social networking sites and has provided unique and effective ways for companies
to promote their business but is it worth the cost of losing their intellectual
property rights?
An interesting point, but I don't think the interpretation is exactly correct. Reading this and the BBJ article, the owner doesn't lose ownership. Pinterest has the right to "sublicense." I translate that that Pinterest can sell the owner's content, which I don't find attractive, but it still technically belongs to the original content owner.
ReplyDeleteI've noticed those sensitive to possible copyright infringements are adding watermarks to their Pins.
ReplyDelete